Home > Runtime Exception > When Should I Throw A Runtime Exception

When Should I Throw A Runtime Exception


To comply with ERR07-J, the coders may not use this method, and must modify it in a major way (prob by making it generic, perhaps?) However, Turning every exception into a Create a function and pass it every single transaction. The justification is that there is nothing my client could do about an SQLException. This provides the ability to differentiate issues that you should handle and let the program survive versus errors that should be a "Do not pass go" scenario. http://evollux.net/runtime-exception/java-throw-exception-runtimeexception.html

share|improve this answer answered May 5 '09 at 13:24 Robin 19.1k23949 The java compiler doesn't force you, to handle declared RuntimeExceptions. I will also summarize the recent debate about the use of checked exceptions. The checked exception contract between the API and its client soon changes into an unwanted burden if the client code is unable to deal with the exception effectively. Developers who put more emphasis on writing pretty code (sorry, "highly expressive") might want to consider becoming artists instead, where they can fashion "pretty" creations to their heart's content.

Java Runtimeexception Example

The best example I can think of (and one that a JEE developer who uses JPA should be intimately familiar with) is that that the getSingleResult() method of the Query object Yes, we should. Then,.. Unchecked exceptions will blithely and without warning completely explode your stack.

It should be a NullPointerException, ArgumentException, etc. Thus, the compiler does not require that you catch or specify runtime exceptions (although you can). On an application which you are developing for users, what will be a need for throwing a Runtime exception? –randominstanceOfLivingThing Jan 25 '13 at 15:53 Also, Even if a Can We Throw Runtime Exception In Java There is the possibility of runtime exceptions almost everywhere - notably NullPointerException, ArithmeticException, ArrayIndexOutOfBounds exceptions, etc.

Yes, you absolutely should document all exceptions thrown by your API, but the question isn't about that. –Gili Oct 31 at 2:42 add a comment| up vote 3 down vote In How To Handle Runtime Exception In Java Example The author's example seems fine, provided they can distinguish an exception-from-a-B-transaction vs an exception-from-a-program-bug. This makes no sense, because more work is required without checked exceptions. Whatever accurately describes what went wrong.

They wanted: a cleaner, robust and portable approach built in language support for error checking and handling. Is It Good Practice To Throw Runtimeexception What is a real-world metaphor for irrational numbers? Reply Anonymous says: March 10, 2013 at 12:52 pm Actually "OutOfMemory" is an ERROR, not a RuntimeException. This is especially important when the interface is a public one, of course, but it's a very good idea in private interfaces as well.

How To Handle Runtime Exception In Java Example

In what spot would the new Star Wars movie "Rogue One" go in the Machete Order? Hot Network Questions Using flags vs. Java Runtimeexception Example What do I do if my supervisor insists that the classical CLT is false and wants me to write that in my paper? Unchecked Exception For example, dividing a number by 0 will generate a run time exception, ArithmeticException.

Instead of executing the next instruction in the sequence, the control is transferred to the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) which tries to find an appropriate exception handler in the program and transfer control to Check This Out Output integers in negative order, increase the maximum integer everytime Does a symbol like this or a similar thing already exsist and has its meaning or not? Compliments? share|improve this answer answered Dec 18 '14 at 3:19 Doorknob 33.8k1862106 The only correct answer imho since it points out that IllegalArumentException is a RuntimeException.. –displayname May 3 at Java Unchecked Exception List

This is a controversial topic with no widespread consensus. This raises a general issue about the Java exception handling rules/recommendations: Do the rules/recs subscribe to the philosophy that unchecked exceptions should only be used to indicate unrecoverable errors and should My anecdotal but extensive experience is that languages with only unchecked exceptions cause far too many costly (in both time and money) production headaches. http://evollux.net/runtime-exception/java-throw-new-runtime-exception.html Scala's Option type is another example of this - I've watched people be sort of annoyed by it at first, but it tends to really improve the reliability and overall quality

If shuffle were a method of the Deck class that would remove any need to check for nulls. –Matt Coubrough Dec 18 '14 at 3:26 From the javadoc: IllegalArgumentException: How To Handle Unchecked Exceptions In Java Checked and unchecked Exceptions are that, what Java really means with (Compiletime-)Exceptions (checked) and RuntimeExceptions (unchecked). –Guardian667 Jul 8 at 11:49 In Spring declaring unchecked exceptions in method signature Reply lucian1900 says: March 11, 2013 at 8:06 pm Scala's Option is a monad, so it's very easy to chain several actions and safely decide if they all succeeded or failed.

asked 5 years ago viewed 35907 times active 5 months ago Blog Developers, webmasters, and ninjas: what's in a job title?

Or don't, and pay UncleSam. Subscribed! Reply Code Monkey (@idiotmonkeycodr) says: March 9, 2013 at 6:04 pm You can invoke GC (which generally speaking, you should not), but this doesn't guarantee it will clean up anything. Java Exception Hierarchy Am I wrong?

It is very easy to use checked exceptions when they are not meant to be used (unrecoverable conditions, or even control flow). and should rarely, if ever be caught, No. This practice may be even wise. http://evollux.net/runtime-exception/java-throw-runtime-exception.html Declaring it in the javadoc is a better approach since it allows someone to handle it if they think it is necessary, but knowing they can ignore it if they want.

over-error-handling. The problems with this are The distinction is really up to the caller, not the code that throws the exception It's completely orthogonal to the semantic meaning of an exception, but You don't even have to waste time looking up documentation (which may be wrong or even nonexistent). david says: April 2, 2013 at 11:59 am "Java is flawed by design.

And what if he throws a custom exception that he has implemented that inherits directly from RuntimeException? –RoflcoptrException Nov 23 '11 at 16:58 25 @Gary Buyn: many people think that Using flags vs. Best Practices for Designing the API Having said all of this, let us now talk about how to design an API that throws exceptions properly. 1. Thanks for posting.

Checked exceptions have wasted hundreds of hours of my time, not just writing lame wrappers so that I don't have to type try/catch on every line of code, but also by what is the difference between `>> /dev/stderr` (with the white space) and `>&2`? Exceptions should only be handled at the point where the code can do something sensible with them. My view is that the only valid reason to use a checked exception is for a condition that you expect all callers to handle immediately. –Michael Borgwardt Nov 24 '11 at

Where should a galactic capital be?