Home > Runtime Exception > Why Not Catch Runtime Exceptions

Why Not Catch Runtime Exceptions


The best argument I've heard against checked exceptions is that they "bloat the code". While Java forces developers to catch unchecked exceptions, it cannot force them to handle these exceptions. One-liners that aren't backed up with facts, references, or experiences aren't very helpful. –user8 Jul 11 '11 at 9:53 add a comment| protected by gnat Jun 23 at 11:20 Thank you Thanks for posting. have a peek at this web-site

Consider the following: StringReader sr = new StringReader("{\"test\":\"test\"}"); try { doesSomethingWithReader(sr); // calls #read, so propagates IOException } catch (IOException e) { throw new IllegalStateException(e); } In this example, the code Such approaches are clearly justified when program termination would have safety-critical or mission-critical consequences.A system that catches all exceptions that propagate out of each major subsystem, logs the exceptions for later I always thought this is very bad practice. Complaints?

Catch Runtime Exception C++

In the 2nd CE, the none of the expressions in the divide() method throw IOException, which makes the method declaration a bit confusing. These usually indicate programming bugs, such as logic errors or improper use of an API. It's called the RuntimeException.

Checked exception classes (mostly): Exception Exception and its sub-classes must be caught and as such they force the programmer to think (and hopefully) deal with the situation. It is a signal that something Permalink Mar 15, 2011 Dhruv Mohindra Thanks Dave. Reply traxtech says: March 9, 2013 at 5:00 pm And that's just one example amongst thousands of others😦 javax.xml.ws.WebServiceException is also quite commonly annoying. Why Is It Not Necessary To Handle Runtime Exception Exceptional Behavior (ERR) Skip to end of banner JIRA links Go to start of banner ERR08-J.

There's nearly alwas some level at which you can and should say "OK, this action failed, so we show/log a nice error message and continue with / wait for the next What Occurs When An Exception Is Not Caught In The Current Method? Code reviews in languages with only unchecked exceptions are much more difficult and time consuming. 3. Country code lookup for each line in a CSV file Expected numbers for user engagement Is a unary language regular iff its exponent is a linear function? I've been leaning more and more to liking it when APIs force consumers to at least be aware of known error conditions.

share|improve this answer edited May 8 '15 at 21:41 b4hand 5,74432241 answered Dec 30 '09 at 21:33 fastcodejava 18.5k1796143 add a comment| up vote 1 down vote You catch RuntimeExceptions (in Catching Nullpointerexception There are much better alternatives like .NET. Attempts to continue execution after first catching and logging (or worse, suppressing) the exception rarely succeed.Likewise, programs must not catch RuntimeException, Exception, or Throwable. Discussing the arguments from both sides are beyond the scope of this post.

What Occurs When An Exception Is Not Caught In The Current Method?

Because of this, classB did not throw any exception and classA's initialization failed too. At least I would prefer that, because: it clearly documents, that this method does not work with null parameter, it does not make any difference for the caller and it does Catch Runtime Exception C++ The ExceptionReporter class is documented in ERR00-J. Can We Throw Runtime Exception In Java Not the answer you're looking for?

A test suite is a fine situation to do this — you want to know which of all the tests failed, not just the first test. Check This Out If SQLException occurs, the catch clause throws a new RuntimeException. There is just one sub-class which is different, that is, unlike it's parent the Exception class, it is unchecked. JUST STOP IT. Catching Exception Is Not Allowed Checkstyle

But maybe i am wrong. The reasons I catch exceptions are: Catch Log and Fix problem. If the exception is never thrown, there is virtually no overhead or associated costs of try and catch. Source This provides the ability to differentiate issues that you should handle and let the program survive versus errors that should be a "Do not pass go" scenario.

These will not happen often but making them an exception allows implementers of languages with numeric type promotion to remove their own checks, and for the JIT to optimise the entire The Difference Between Throw And Throws Is Correctly Explained By Which Of The Following Statements? As for case (b) the user should see a more sanitized message makes perfect sense to catch and process. Performance Impact of DescribeSObjects vs.

share|improve this answer answered Jun 21 '14 at 18:24 Jon Skeet 915k50166407542 ....hi can you please elaborate how checked and unchecked exceptions behave differently ? –Sumit Pal Singh Jun

asked 6 years ago viewed 40256 times active 5 months ago Blog Developers, webmasters, and ninjas: what's in a job title? Why is this so? 1 which of these two block would catch more exceptions , Exception or RuntimeException 0 Understanding the Try Catch block behavior 0 Catching exception Related 1327Catch multiple Using ozone as oxidizer What exactly is f => f in JavaScript? Java Exception Not Caught When should exceptions be left unhandled?

Blanket-catching everything - either Exception or Throwable, which is far worse - is not a good practice because you're assuming that you can recover from any exceptional behavior. I agree it shouldn’t be a general practice, but it has its benefits. If the ground's normal force cancels gravity, how does a person keep rotating with the Earth? have a peek here The only odd thing about RuntimeException is that it (and subclasses) are unchecked exceptions, whereas Exception and all other subclasses of Exception are checked.

It also violates the design principle that exceptions should be used only for exceptional conditions because ignoring a null Log object is part of the ordinary operation of a server.Compliant Solution Permalink Nov 19, 2009 David Svoboda I don't see any context, but this looks like it falls under EXC32-J-EX1. Therefore, the question seems faulty. –S.Lott Jul 11 '11 at 19:06 add a comment| 5 Answers 5 active oldest votes up vote 14 down vote accepted It depends. The OnErrorResumeNext would occur when someone catches an exception and simply ignores it or just prints it out.

Read the Java tutorial: docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/essential/exceptions/index.h‌tml –Jon Skeet Jun 24 '14 at 16:52 add a comment| up vote 2 down vote Throwable is super class of all Exception checked and unchecked(RuntimeException) and Hot Network Questions Using flags vs. When is it appropriate to throw a checked exception? The "burden" of dealing with them is minuscule, especially when using modern IDEs.

Are the mountains surrounding Mordor natural? Sometimes hardware faults need to power cycled :) If I remember, the last resort after an unsuccessful power cycle was it sending an email to it's owners, saying "I tried to catch(Exception exc) { /* won't catch RuntimeException */ but catch(Throwable exc) { /* will catch RuntimeException */ I know RuntimeException is special in that it's unchecked. Now the word "recover" may be tricky here.

Please provide specific examples of where you have doubts. –S.Lott Jul 11 '11 at 11:23 @S.Lott I kind of disagree in this case as it seems there is a try it and catch the exception. –user281377 Jul 11 '11 at 10:51 1 Also, there are files that must exist for the running of the application. So, I'll catch exceptions in the fetch method. I do not think it is always an incorrect practice to turn checked exceptions into some flavor of runtime exception.

The last Java project that I worked on had a similar approach, at the very least, we would log the exception so that if a user called complaining about a bug,